Tehachapi Uplands Multi-Species Habitat Conservation Plan

Below you will find the Federal Register Publication about the public "scoping" period regarding Tejon Ranch Company’s ‘Incidental Take’ permit request for several threatened or endangered species, including the California Condor.

Note: Written comments from the public must be submitted before July 7, 2008.

Written comments submitted to:
Mary Grim
Section 10 Program Coordinator
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service
2800 Cottage Way, W-2605
Sacramento, CA 95825.

Comments may also be sent by e-mail to: tu_hcp_eis@fws.gov

For further information, contact Mary Grim, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, at 916-414-6464.




Federal Register/Vol. 73, No. 108/Wednesday, June 4, 2008/Notices

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Fish and Wildlife Service
[FWS-R8-ES-2008-N0109; 80221-1112-0000-F2]
Tehachapi Uplands Multi-Species Habitat Conservation Plan

AGENCY: Fish and Wildlife Service, Interior.

ACTION: Notice of intent.

SUMMARY: Pursuant to the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA), we, the Fish and Wildlife Service (Service), advise the public of our intent to gather information necessary to prepare an Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) on the Tehachapi Uplands Multi-species Habitat Conservation Plan (MSHCP). Tejon Ranch is preparing the MSHCP to apply for a 50-year incidental take permit under Section 10(a)(l)(B) of the Federal Endangered Species Act of 1973, as amended, (Act). The permit is needed to authorize the incidental take of threatened and endangered species that could occur as a result of activities covered by the plan.   The Service provides this notice to (1) describe the proposed action and possible alternatives; (2) advise other Federal and State agencies, affected Tribes, and the public of our intent to prepare an EIS; (3) announce the initiation of a public scoping period; and (4) obtain suggestions and information on the scope of issues to be included in the EIS. Similar Notices of Intent were published on June 25, 2004 (69 FR 35663) and March 26, 2008 (73FR 16052). This notice is being published to clarify the proposed action,to correct a previous ADDRESSES error, and to allow additional public input.

DATES: Written comments should be received on or before July 7, 2008.

ADDRESSES: Written comments submitted to:
Mary Grim
Section 10 Program Coordinator
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service
2800 Cottage Way, W-2605
Sacramento, CA 95825.

Comments may also be sent by e-mail to tu_hcp_eis@fws.gov

Comments previously received during previous public scoping periods will also be considered.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Mary Grim, U.S. Fish and Wildlife
Service, at 916-414-6464.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Background
Section 9 of the Act and Federal regulations prohibit the “take” of wildlife species listed as endangered or threatened (16 U.S.C. 1538). The Act Federal Register defines the term “take” as: to harass, harm, pursue, hunt, shoot, wound, kill, trap, capture, or collect listed species, or to attempt to engage in such conduct (16 U.S.C. 1532). Harm includes significant habitat modification or degradation that actually kills or injures listed wildlife by significantly impairing essential behavioral patterns, including breeding, feeding, and sheltering [50 CFR 17.3(c)L Pursuant to section 10(a)(l)(B) of the Act, the Service may issue permits to authorize “incidental take” of listed animal species. “Incidental Take” is defined by the Act as take that is incidental to, and not the purpose of, carrying out an otherwise lawful activity. Regulations governing permits for threatened species and endangered species, respectively, are at 50 CFR 17.32 and 50 CFR 17.22. All species included on an incidental take permit would receive assurances under the Service’s “No Surprises” regulation [50 CFR 17.22(b)(5) and 17.32(b)(5)].   Species proposed for coverage in the HCP are species that are currently listed as federally threatened or endangered or have the potential to become listed during the life of this MSHCP and have some likelihood to occur within the project area. Should any of the unlisted covered wildlife species become listed under the Act during the term of the permit, take authorization for those species would become effective upon listing. Six plant species and 28 animal species are known to occur within the area and are proposed to be covered by the MSHCP. Species may be added to or deleted from the list of proposed covered species during the course of the development of the MSHCP based on further analysis, new information, agency consultation, and public comment. Currently, the MSHCP would include the following federally listed animal species: California condor [Gymnogyps calif ornianus), least Bell’s vireo (Vireo belli! pusillus), southwestern willow flycatcher (Empidonax traillii extimus), Valley elderberry longhorn beetle (Democerus calif ornicus dimorphus), and Western yellow-billed cuckoo (Coccyzus americanus occidentalis). The MSHCP would also include the following State listed and unlisted species: Tehachapi slender salamander (Batrachoseps stebbinsi), bald eagle (Haliaeetus leucocephalus), American peregrine falcon (Faico peregrines anatuin), little willow flycatcher [Empidonax traillii brewsteri), golden eagle (Aquila chrysaetos), white-tailed kite (Elanus leucorux), ringtail (Bassariscus astutus), tricolored blackbird (Agelaius tricolor), California spotted owl (Strix occidentalis occidentalis), Tehachapi pocket mouse (Perognathus alticolus inexpectatus), burrowing owl (Athene cunicularia), yellow-blotched salamander (Ensatina eschscholtzi croceater), western spadefoot (Spea hammondii), purple martin (Progne subis), nothern goshawk (Accipiter gentalis), coast horned lizard (frontale and blainfilli populations of Phrynosoma coronatum), Cooper’s hawk (Accipiter cooperii), yellow-breasted chat (Icteria virens), prarie falcon (Falco mexicanus), northern harrier (Circus cyneus), long-eared owl (Asio otus), two-striped garter snake (Thamnophis hammodii), round leaved filaree (Erodium macrophyllum), Fort Tejon woolly sunflower (Eriophyllum lanatum var. hallii), Kusche’s sandwort (Amenaria macradenia var. kuschei), Tehachapi buckwheat (Eriogonum callistum), American badger (Taxidea taxus), striped adobe lily (Fritillaria striata) and Tejon poppy (Eschscholzia lemmonii ssp. Kernensis).

Activities proposed to be covered by the MSHCP include limited private development; livestock grazing and range management; film production; maintenance and construction of undergeround utilities; recreation with the exception of hunting; existing commercial and residential improvements; farming and irrigation systems; repair, maintenance and use of roads; and existing mineral extraction facilities. The MSHCP would not cover hunting, nor would it cover the lethal take of California condors. The MSHCP will propose a conservation strategy to minimize and mitigate to the maximum extent possible any impacts that would occur to covered species as the result of the covered activities.

Environmental Impact Statement

The EIS will consider the proposed action (i.e., the issuance of a section 10(a)l(B) permit under the Act), no action (no section 10 permit), and a reasonable range of alternatives. A detailed description of the proposed action and alternatives will be included in the EIS. The EIS will also identify potentially significant impacts on biological resources, land use, air quality, water resources, transportation, and other environmental resource issues that could occur directly or indirectly with implementation of the proposed action and alternatives. Different strategies for avoiding, minimizing, and mitigating the impacts of incidental take may also be considered.

Environmental review of the EIS will be conducted in accordance with the requirements ofNEPA (42 U.S.C. 4321 et seq.), its implementing regulations__ (40 CFR parts 1500-1508), other  applicable regulations, and Service  procedures for compliance with those  regulations. This notice is being  furnished in accordance with 40 CFR  Section 1501.7 and 1508.22 to obtain  suggestions and information from other  agencies and the public on the scope of  issues and alternatives to be addressed  in the EIS. The primary purpose of the  scoping process is to identify important  issues raised by the public related to the  proposed action. Written comments  from interested parties are invited to  ensure that the full range of issues  related to the permit application is  identified. Comments will only be  accepted in written form. All comments  received, including names and  addresses, will become part of the  official administrative record and may  be made available to the public.

Before including your address, phone  number, e-mail address, or other  personal identifying information in your  comment, you should be aware that  your entire comment—including your  personal identifying information—may be made publicly available at any time. While you may ask us in your comment  to withhold your personal identifying information from public review, we  cannot guarantee that we will be able to  do so.

Dated: May 29, 2008.
Ken McDermond,
Deputy Regional Director, California Nevada
Region, Sacramento, California.
[FR Doc. E8-12426 Filed 6-3-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-55-P

This is part of the July 18, 2014 online edition of The Mountain Enterprise.

Have an opinion on this matter? We'd like to hear from you.